This pages includes guidance for developing a SR search strategy. See the Search Techniques page of this guide for information on using Boolean (AND and OR) and controlled vocabulary (e.g MeSH) for building the search.
PubMed and Ovid Medline are both MEDLINE. You only need to search one or the other. Not both.
For an up-to-date SR with the most recent literature, the search should be repeated before the final analysis in order to capture literature that was published since the initial search.
A well designed SR search strategy should be sensitive enough to capture all relevant literature, which means that it will also retrieve a higher proportion of irrelevant results. It is normal for a SR search strategy to retrieve hundreds or thousands of results that do not meet the eligibility criteria. This part of the process. The SR team will identify the relevant articles during title & abstract screening and full-text review.
An SR search strategy must be broad enough to capture all relevant literature. A well-formulated PICO question will help you to identify the main concepts for your search strategy.
In most cases:
In most databases, you are searching the title, abstract, keywords and other citation data. You are not searching the full-text of the articles.
PICO | Example | Include in search? |
---|---|---|
P (population) | Children/Adolescents | Yes |
P (problem) | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Yes |
I | Exercise and motor interventions in addition to medical intervention | Yes |
C | Medical intervention without exercise and motor interventions | No |
O | Physical activity and motor outcomes | No |
Children AND Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia AND Exercise |
In this example, we can combine P (population) AND P (problem) AND I (intervention) with the Boolean operator AND to find literature with all three concepts. The C (comparison) and O (outcomes) with be analyzed during the review process. |
PICO | Example | Include in search? |
---|---|---|
P | Patients with Choledocholithiasis | Yes |
I | Endoscopic papillary dilation after Sphincterotomy | Yes |
C | Sphincterotomy alone | Yes |
O | Complete stone removal, adverse events, procedure time | No |
Strategy 1: choledocholithiasis AND endoscopic papillary dilation AND sphincterotomy Strategy 2: choledocholithiasis AND (endoscopic papillary dilation OR sphincterotomy) |
Strategy 1: Use this strategy if you only want literature that directly compares the intervention and comparison in a single study. Strategy 2: Use this strategy if you want literature that directly compares the intervention and comparison in a single study AND studies that examine sphincterotomy alone. Combining the intervention with the comparison with OR instead of AND broadens the search to find more literature. The best strategy will depend on your question and the literature available to answer your question. |
Tip! Develop search strategy on a text document and then copy and paste into databases.
Gather synonyms and related terms for each concept.
Concept |
Search Strategy [each concept should include a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary (when applicable) AND may include a combination of OR and AND boolean operators] |
---|---|
LGBTQ |
"Sexual and Gender Minorities"[Mesh] OR "Homosexuality"[Mesh] OR "Bisexuality"[Mesh] OR "Transgender Persons"[Mesh] OR homosexuality OR lesbian OR gay OR bisexual OR transgender OR queer |
Nursing Education |
"Education, Nursing, Associate"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Diploma Programs"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Graduate"[Mesh] OR "Students, Nursing"[Mesh] OR "Schools, Nursing"[Mesh] OR "Faculty, Nursing"[Mesh] OR Nursing education OR Nursing curriculum OR Nursing schools OR Nursing students OR Nursing faculty |
Cultural Competency | "Healthcare Disparities"[Mesh] OR "Cultural Competency"[Mesh] OR "Culturally Competent Care"[Mesh] OR competent OR competence OR competency OR competencies |
Put it all together:
("Sexual and Gender Minorities"[Mesh] OR "Homosexuality"[Mesh] OR "Bisexuality"[Mesh] OR "Transgender Persons"[Mesh] OR homosexuality OR lesbian OR gay OR bisexual OR transgender OR queer) AND ("Education, Nursing, Associate"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Diploma Programs"[Mesh] OR "Education, Nursing, Graduate"[Mesh] OR "Students, Nursing"[Mesh] OR "Schools, Nursing"[Mesh] OR "Faculty, Nursing"[Mesh] OR Nursing education OR Nursing curriculum OR Nursing schools OR Nursing students OR Nursing faculty) AND ("Healthcare Disparities"[Mesh] OR "Cultural Competency"[Mesh] OR "Culturally Competent Care"[Mesh] OR competent OR competence OR competency OR competencies)
Some strategies for improving search results:
SR teams should search multiple databases.
Peer review of SR searches can help identify errors in the search strategy. The peer review of SR searches can greatly improve the quality of the search and increase the number of relevant records found for inclusion in reviews, and thus improve the overall quality of the SR.
Authors can use Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) Guideline statement and checklist to review and revise their own strategies. Authors can also ask an experienced searcher, information specialist or librarian to review using the PRESS checklist.
PRISMA Checklist items related to search
# 6 Information Sources: Specify all databases, registers, websites, organisations, reference lists and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. Specify the date when each source was last searched or consulted.
# 7 Search Strategy: Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers and websites, including any filters and limits used.