Skip to Main Content

Evaluating Information Sources

Tips on evaluating popular and scholarly articles, bias and propaganda in publishing, impact metrics and predatory publishing.

Bias in the News

Use the links below to discover where your favorite news source falls on the political spectrum and the bias it may have.

How to Identify Bias

Bias is a leaning or prejudice in favor of or against one side, person, item, or group compared with another, often in an unfair manner.

Publication Types and Bias

Since anyone can write and publish anything, we have articles that focus on legitimate research and reporting and we have articles filled with lies, "fake news", and propaganda. Authors of scholarly and research-oriented articles (Scholarship) seek to identify the truth as they understand it. All authors (and publications) have a Bias, some write to that bias and others try to be more balanced in their writing. When the author focuses on persuasion using bias, emotional appeals and distortion of facts, the article enters the category of Propaganda.  The University of Michigan Library offers an excellent chart on: 

From Scholarship to Propaganda

Indicators of Scholarship vs. Indicators of Propaganda

While scholarship and objective news reporting is created with a focus on the ideal of truth, propaganda actively seeks to influence through the use of deception.  Presenting a point of view is different from deliberately using psychological techniques to shape the opinion of others.

 Indicators of Scholarship  Indicators of Propaganda
 Describes limits of data; Admits own ignorance and uncertainty; Strives for truth/facts  Excessive claims of certainty (We have "the way, the view"); Mixes both truth and falsehood
 Presents accurate descriptions of alternative views  Personal attacks and ridicule on alternative views; Identifies one point of view as the only view
 Presents data that do not favor preferred views as well as data that supports those views  Distorts or manipulates data to support preferred views
 Encourages debate, discussion, criticism, Relies on critical thinking skills  Relies on emotional appeals and suggestion (e.g., negative innuendo);
 Settles disputes by use of generally accepted criteria for evaluating data  Devalues thought and critical appraisal; suppresses contradictory views
 Looks for counter-examples  Suppresses contradictory facts, Magnifies or minimizes problems and suggested remedies; Offers ready-made answers
 Uses language in agreed-on ways  Transforms words to suit aims
 Updates information  Presents information and views out of context
 Attempts to discuss general laws and principles  Appeals to popular prejudices; deliberately misleads
 Invites continuing research  Success measured by changed attitudes/motivations

From Prof. Eileen Gambrill in Bodi, S. (1995). Scholarship or propaganda: How can librarians help undergraduates tell the difference? Journal of Academic Librarianship. 21(1):21–25. With thanks to the UMich Library.