COPYRIGHT: In the context of Digital Humanities projects, "copyright" refers to the legal right granted to creators of original works, such as text, images, audio, or video, which gives them exclusive control over how their work can be from copied, distributed, displayed, modified, or adapted by others without permission from the copyright holder. Not observing such conditions is typically considered infringement, unless protected by "fair use" exceptions depending on the specific circumstances.
FAIR USE: “Fair use” refers to the legal doctrine (defined in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act) that allows researchers to use copyrighted material without the copyright owner's permission in some circumstances. "Fair use" in digital humanities projects allows researchers to incorporate limited portions of copyrighted material into their projects without seeking permission, as long as the usage is considered transformative, for purposes like criticism, commentary, research, teaching, or scholarship.
For Companion USC Libraries Research Guides on Copyright and Fair Use see:
Annie Thompson, Copyright and Fair Use, "This guide provides an introduction to copyright and fair use, with a focus on instruction, for USC faculty, students, and staff."
Ruth Wallach, Fair Use, "This guide offers basic information on using images and media in research. Reasonable use of images and media in teaching, course papers, and graduate theses/dissertations is generally covered by fair use."
Issues to consider in digital humanities projects related to copyright:
Research Guides:
American University (Washington DC) - Research Guide: Copyright Guidelines – Intro to Digital Research for Students.
Fordham University - Research Guides: (A) Digital Humanities: Copyright and Digital Projects. (B) Copyright Resources: About Copyright.
BOOK CHAPTER
Nayyer, K. P., & Hawkins, S. (2021). “Issues and Intersections of Indigenous Knowledge Protection and Copyright for Digital Humanities,” in Access and Control in Digital Humanities, Routledge: pp. 192-202 (1st ed.)
This chapter examines legal issues and principles touching on access to and control of Indigenous knowledge, and specifically the intersections of Indigenous peoples’ knowledge protection regimes with domestic enacted copyright laws, jurisprudence, and treaties.
Wharton, R. (2013). Digital humanities, copyright law, and the literary. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1).
Embedded in the rich textual record of international copyright law, we often encounter a quaint, and perhaps naïve definition of the “literary” around which the law has crystallized and which has the potential to influence the work of all digital humanists, whether they think of themselves as literary scholars or not.
Martinez, M., & Terras, M. (2019). ‘Not Adopted’: The UK Orphan Works Licensing Scheme and How the Crisis of Copyright in the Cultural Heritage Sector Restricts Access to Digital Content. Open Library of Humanities, 5(1).
This article is a discussion of how digitizing and disseminating Orphan Works in the GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) sector could have the potential to significantly reframe collections across audiences and institutions in the United Kingdom and across the world. (…) This article addresses two questions: 1) How is current EU Orphan Works legislation affecting the output of digitized content in the UK cultural heritage sector?; and 2) What changes can be made to the implementation of the EU Directive in the UK to better support the mission of cultural heritage institutions, including serving the research and creative communities?
Zeng, H. (2020). Thoughts on Optimizing Digital Humanities Application Platform Based on Copyright. 2020 5th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation (ISCTT), 19–23.
Knowledge discovery is inseparable from data mining and data reconstruction, and the digital humanities application platform provides diversified text mining and visualization methods for further tapping inherent value of information resources. Based on characteristics of the construction of data resources under the environment of digital humanities, the thesis analyzes the copyright dilemma in digital resources development from the aspects of data development methods and data copyright ownership, and explores the two operating mechanisms of Docusky and Hathitrust data capsule, thus to optimize the digital humanities application platform reasonably for the purpose of the balanced interests in the development and utilization of digital resources.
Obimbo, C., & Salami, B. (2009). DIGICOP: A Copyright protection algorithm for Digital Images. 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIC-STH.2009.5444366
In this Paper, we present a new imperceptible digital watermarking system for images. This system is used for copyright protection and is compared with base watermarking method (BWM) proposed by Koch et. al. The developed system is called “Digital Image Copyright Protector” (DIGICOP). It automatically generates the content owner's unique Identification Mark from a supplied text string and a secret key. DCT is used as the embedding domain to achieve high resilience against image processing attacks, such as compression using JPEG, Gaussian Noise, Blurring, Color Inversion, Scaling and Cropping.
Ketzan, E., Kamocki, P., & Hawkins, S. (2021). "Digital Humanities Research under United States and European Copyright Laws: Evolving Frameworks," in Access and Control in Digital Humanities, Routledge: pp. 233–248 (1st ed.).
This chapter summarizes the current state of copyright laws in the United States and European Union that most affect Digital Humanities research, namely the fair use doctrine in the US and research exceptions in Europe, including the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, which has been finally adopted in 2019. This summary begins with a description of recent copyright advances most relevant to DH research, and finishes with an analysis of a significant remaining legal hurdle which DH researchers face: how do fair use and research exceptions deal with the critical issue of circumventing technological protection measures (TPM, a.k.a. DRM).
Organisciak, P., & Downie, J. S. (2022). Research access to in-copyright texts in the humanities. In Information and Knowledge Organisation in Digital Humanities, Routledge: pp. 157–177 (1st ed.)
Text analysis in the digital humanities is challenged by legal hurdles, which make it difficult to access and especially to redistribute datasets of modern texts. As large digitisation projects grow, copyright challenges are increasingly acute. We discuss the legal landscape around large bibliographic datasets and explore principles of non-expressive and non-consumptive access as one solution to enabling research access to sensitive texts. Non-consumptive access seeks to make text available in an abstracted but maximally useless form, supporting research use without distributing the original, readable text.
Kheria, S., Waelde, C., Levin, N., & Hobbs, R. (2018). "Digital Transformations in the Arts and Humanities: Negotiating the Copyright Landscape in the United Kingdom," in The Routledge Companion to Media Education, Copyright, and Fair Use Routledge: pp. 182–200 (1st ed.).
Friedman, E. C., & Hawkins, S. (2021). “Ownership, Copyright, and the Ethics of the Unpublished, chap. 13 In Access and Control in Digital Humanities, Routledge: pp .222-232 (1st ed.).
(A discussion of) ... the logistical, budgetary, and legal challenges before turning to the still more-numinous ethical quandaries that arise when working with material that was never part of a commercial print marketplace. Unpublished manuscript fiction provides an unusual and useful edge case for discoverability, description, digitization, and dissemination. While technology and the march of time will alleviate some of the specific challenges of transcription and copyright limits discussed in this essay, questions about our responsibility to material, and the double-edged sword of “access”, will remain as long as some notion of ownership, authority, and privacy remain.